Architectural Flashing Supply
Start a Quote
Peer review and constructability · Lesson 1 of 4

Peer review and constructability: principles and terminology

What a peer review is under NIBS Guideline 3, what makes it independent, how CII defines constructability, and the ladder of checks a flashing detail passes before AFS fabricates it: designer, contractor QC, approval, AFS shop confirmation.

You will be able to: Define peer review, independent peer review and constructability with their sources, name each step of the review ladder on a flashing job, and state what review does not do.

11 min · 12 slides · 8 questions

All lessons in this module
Slide 1 of 12

Glossary

Peer review
In NIBS Guideline 3, an objective technical review of design documents, submittals or shop drawings by a Building Enclosure Specialist, to evaluate the proposed systems and details for compliance with the owner's project requirements.
Independent peer review
In NIBS Guideline 3, a peer review by a specialist who has no relationship to any firm providing services to the project and no known or potential conflict of interests.
Constructability
CII's term for the optimal use of construction knowledge and experience in planning, design, procurement and field operations. In plain terms: whether a detail can be built, in order, by the people who will build it.
Owner's project requirements (OPR)
The owner's criteria that NIBS Guideline 3 compares an enclosure design against; NIBS calls the OPR a living document for the enclosure commissioning process.
G item
In a UFGS section, a submittal marked G needs Government approval before use; other items are approved through the contractor's own quality control. UFGS is a federal guide specification, not a building code.