ASCE 7 wind load fundamentals
How a wind speed becomes a design pressure on roof-edge metal, which ASCE 7 edition sits behind which code, a worked zone-pressure example, and how ES-1 test ratings, field failures and the engineer of record fit together.
4 lessons · about 47 min · 13 diagrams · 0 videos
Version 1.0.0
Builds on these modules
Related Academy lessons
Lessons
0 of 4 complete
Lesson 1 · 12 min · 12 slides · 9 questions
ASCE 7 wind load fundamentals: principles and terminology
Why the roof edge is where wind loads concentrate, what ASCE 7 is and how the building code brings it in, the chain from wind speed to zone pressure, and who does what.
You will be able to: Describe how a wind speed becomes a design pressure on edge metal, name the factors and categories that shape it, and say who decides each input.
Not startedStart →Lesson 2 · 12 min · 11 slides · 10 questions
ASCE 7 wind load fundamentals: materials, standards and design constraints
Which ASCE 7 edition sits behind which code, what changed in ASCE 7-22, Kz and the roof zone coefficients, strength level versus allowable stress, the ES-1 test methods, and where published sources disagree.
You will be able to: Match ASCE 7 editions to building codes, read the zone coefficients and enclosure and unit conventions, and place ES-1 test methods and the safety-factor disagreement.
Not startedStart →Lesson 3 · 12 min · 11 slides · 10 questions
ASCE 7 wind load fundamentals: methods and worked application
A worked example from a trade seminar: velocity pressure, four roof zones, the zone width, conversion to allowable stress, a trap in the source, the square law, and a comparison that depends on the safety-factor convention.
You will be able to: Build a zone pressure by hand from written-down inputs, convert between strength level and allowable stress, compare it with a published rating, and document every assumption.
Not startedStart →Lesson 4 · 11 min · 11 slides · 9 questions
ASCE 7 wind load fundamentals: defects, verification and case study
Why roof perimeters fail first, what three hurricanes and an insurer study showed, common specification and installation defects, why an ES-1 rating covers only the assembly as tested, and a verification chain with its safety limits.
You will be able to: Recognise how edge-metal wind failures start, read what field evidence shows, and follow a verification chain from the specification to the roof without claiming a rating that was not tested.
Not startedStart →
Practical task
Build a wind-pressure job packet for the SPRI worked example (Chicago, Exposure C, 40 ft, enclosed, 119 mph), then repeat the method on a second, hypothetical set of inputs of your own, labelled as hypothetical. Show every step, write the level beside every pressure, and finish by stating what you are not deciding.
Hand in
- A decision rationale: which ASCE 7 edition and building code you are working to, where the wind speed came from, and who decides each input
- A marked-up roof sketch showing the perimeter and corner zones, the zone width a and where edge metal sits
- An assumptions table with units: V and its source, risk category, exposure, mean roof height, Kz (table or formula), Kzt, Kd, Ke, enclosure class and the safety-factor convention
- The calculation: q, the four zone pressures at strength level and at allowable-stress level, each tagged with its level
- A quality checklist following the five verification stations, and a short defect analysis of one specification that says only "wind rated"
Rubric
| Criterion | Meets the standard when |
|---|---|
| Inputs recorded | Every input is on the page with units and a source, and the ASCE 7 edition is named. |
| Calculation | q and the four zone pressures reproduce the worked example, with a level (strength or ASD) beside every pressure. |
| Zone width | The zone width a is worked out from the rule as presented, and the rule is marked for checking in ASCE 7. |
| Comparison | Any comparison with a published rating shows more than one safety-factor convention and says the engineer of record decides. |
| Defect analysis | The defect names what the specification omits, such as the wind speed, the edition, the zone pressures or the tested assembly. |
| Boundaries | The packet states that it is not a design, sizes no edge, sets no fastener spacing and gives no wind speed for a real address. |
